Brian Lufkin, BBC career
Employers like to operate video calling cameras. But workers can make the strong argument that they should not appear on screen when they do not want to.
“Hello, team! It would be great if we could all turn on our cameras for this meeting.” In the age of distance work it has become a common refrain – but a phrase that many employees dread.
Platforms like Zoom have been a blessing in disguise during the Govt-19 shutdown, allowing many to work from home.
But, two and a half years after the epidemic, the same technology has become a curse.
Millions of workers these days spend hours a day on video calls, trying to decode the body language of their co-workers or being distracted by their own screenplay.
Having a camera can often be seen as a sign of commitment, proof that an employee is truly investing in his or her work.
But experts suggest turning off the cameras can alleviate the annoyance of constantly appearing on screen, as well as improve employee well-being – and make meetings more efficient.
At the beginning of the epidemic, it made perfect sense that people wanted to shoot because we lived with the idea that this would be a two-week break in our lives – so we ‘want to see everyone, we want to connect,’ ‘says Alison Gabriel, a professor of management and organization at the University of Arizona in the United States. He studied the effects of zoom fatigue.
But according to experts, the reason why cameras are still considered to be enabled by default is related to the old and complicated rules regarding pre-infection presantism.
Historically, workers have felt the pressure to be seen in front of the employer.
In the office, that means working long hours, networking or finding ways to draw attention to one’s contribution.
As long-distance work began, that pressure shifted to virtual encounters. Employees felt compelled to wear cameras so employers could see them and their engagement.
Studies show that workers understand their employers well; Data shows that employers are worried that employees whose cameras are turned off will be laid off.
In a 2022 survey, 92% of senior executives believe that people who turn off their cameras have no long-term future at the company.
“Often we see the camera as the only indicator of engagement” – Alison Gabriel
There is also an element of micromanagement: employers ask employees to run webcams and transfer control of office behavior to the virtual world.
“This is the closest thing we know: if you are a manager, you are accustomed to the old way of working, if you are a manager, to see if people are working at their desks,” Gabriel explains.
But workers are well aware that operating cameras for everything can have adverse effects and exacerbate zoom fatigue: the fatigue of trying to take non-verbal notes related to factors such as adjusting your own appearance on camera is much easier to explain in person.
(The feature that covers your face on your screen is magnified, while others are visible).
These distractions reduce productivity, says Winnie Shen, associate professor of institutional research at York University in Canada, who says workers ‘focus on themselves and how they feel’ rather than meeting.
By turning off the cameras this distraction can be eliminated and workers can participate more in the meeting.
Also not having a camera can allow employees to do multitasking when asked and work with greater productivity.
“Actually, that’s what I want to do [pendant que j’écoute]It’s like taking notes, looking for something, trying to filter tabs and seeing if I can contribute to the meeting, ”says Gabriel.
In addition, the camera-based approach, according to Ms Gabriel, has the potential to create more inclusive companies.
Research shows that newcomers to companies may experience more fatigue with zoom because they believe it is more important to show their faces to their new colleagues, he says.
Women who work from home are also affected due to childcare.
Furthermore, the same study found that introverts experience more zoom fatigue than extroverts.
Turning off the camera can help reduce stress for workers in many of the most vulnerable groups.
What are the best practices for the future?
The good news is, things can change. Seeing people on camera really helps co-workers who are bored, says Mr. Although Gabriel firmly believes that high pressure for video call burning and employee flexibility will change the label of zoom in a new direction.
Some companies have already made cameras an option, especially as more and more research suggests that this approach is better for people’s mental health.
According to Gabriel, we are at an “infiltration point, not against them, but to empower people to create work environments and workplaces for them”.
People will see different balances. According to Ms Shen, seeing people in video calls is beneficial, “it’s not always necessary”.
He suggests that a team can do cameras three days a week and two days off or something like that to get rid of zoom fatigue.
“I think companies can be a little smarter or at least give people a break,” he says.
Employers also need to trust workers and accept that if the cameras are turned off, it does not mean that people are disconnected.
“Most of the time we see the camera as the only indicator of engagement, but what if we are very careful in using other features like polls and chat, it doesn’t matter if the camera is turned on or not?
Zoom has many features – in addition to the camera – which proves that workers participate in meetings.
According to him, the person leading the call needs to set the right tone and tell participants that it is not mandatory to have a camera, whether it is the leader of a makeshift meeting or a remote company- to achieve policies or rules.
Companies and employers affiliated with having more cameras need to ask themselves why they think they need them.
Gabriel and Shen recall that employees worked better for decades with old-fashioned conference calls because they were worried about workers doing something stupid.
Having new operating systems like Zoom does not mean that old practices are outdated.
“Just because technology can do something, doesn’t mean it always makes sense to us,” Shen says.
“Coffee trailblazer. Social media fanatic. Tv enthusiast. Friendly entrepreneur. Amateur zombie nerd.”
Muslim female teachers allowed to wear hijab in schools
The flow of sub-Saharan exiles into Niger is in full swing
In “Parisien”, journalists denounce the pension reform as “discriminatory” in their pages – liberation